Organisational Behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 7

Organisational Behaviour - Essay Example According to Needham (p. 222), hierarchy refers to the structure of organization management where there is direct communication links between superior and subordinates. In this kind if structure each member has a clear understanding of the chain of command and to whom he or she is responsible to. It is from the top of the company, the managing director down to the workforce below. An organization ought to operate within a structure that is appropriate with its purposes for it to fulfill its mission effectively. Large organizations are normally divided into functional areas. In the case of syngenta, its functions includes: research and development, global supply which also include manufacturing, human resources, sales and marketing, finance and information systems. The company’s structure is identical to most companies, it has likelihood of having several layers of authority. The number of levels is determined by structure that the organization has. It can be a flat or hierarch ical structure. A hierarchical structure is composed of several levels of management, each having span of control which is narrow. In this kind of structure, instructions are directed from level of management on the top to the workforce below. Feedback comes vice versa from the workers below to the supervisors on the top. In the hierarchical structure there is chain of control, this is the reporting system from those on the top of the hierarchy to those below. In this kind of structure, there is strict supervision. In addition, this kind of structure has clear promotion opportunities. This clarity reduces the levels of stress among the managers and employees. In this kind structure, everyone knows their roles to play. However, hierarchical organisations face communication challenges, hence, lack of effective management delays the passing of information in the chain of command. Another setback here is that employees may lack full empowerment. This does not allow them to b e innovativ e.

Primary Source Analysis (Between Emerson and Thoreau) Essay

Primary Source Analysis (Between Emerson and Thoreau) - Essay Example This essay examines Emerson’s ‘Nature’ and passages from Thoreau’s ‘Walden,’ arguing that these texts reimagine our epistemological connection with the Universe through poetically reframing the way we approach nature and our philosophical relation to history and humanity. One of the most prominent connections between the texts is the need to view nature through a poetic lens. In this way, both Emerson and Thoreau distinguish between forms of interacting with nature with this poetic lens, and modes where nature is viewed only for its utility. Emerson indicates, â€Å"His relation to nature†¦is through the understanding, as by manure, the economic use of fire, wind, water, and the mariner’s needle† (Emerson, p. 7). This distinction between the poetic view of nature and the economic view of nature is also echoed in Thoreau. Thoreau writes, â€Å"I have frequently seen a poet withdraw, having enjoyed the most valuable part of a farm, while the crusty farmer had supposed that he had got a few wild apples only† (Thoreau, p. 3). In both instances there is the recognition that man’s transcendental interaction with nature must occur under the auspices of poetic observation. Another coinciding element between both texts is a consideration of man’s relation to history. ... Why should not we have a poetry and philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the history of theirs?† (Emerson, p. 3). Later in the text Emerson indicates that the existence of a common man in 19th century America is just as glorious as Julius Caesar’s existence. In this way Emerson is indicating that man’s search for truth and meaning should be rooted in their relationship with nature over their relationship history. To an extent Thoreau embraces Emerson’s epistemological positioning of nature as transcending history. Thoreau writes, â€Å"I have been as sincere a worshipper of Aurora as the Greeks† (Thoreau, p. 5). Still, Thoreau seems more willing to revel in the way that nature brings man into a direction connection with historical precedent. In either instance there is the The means that the texts explore the way man interacts with nature represents another significant consideration. Emerson clearly embraces a phenomenological connection with nature and subsequently the universe. He indicates, â€Å"The foundations of man are not in matter, but in spirit. But the element of spirit is eternity† (Emerson, p. 6). In addition to indicating this means of connecting with nature, Emerson articulates a number of dimensions to his perspective, including notions of the Soul. While Emerson works to create a pantheon of spirituality through reference to the Soul, Thoreau works more to demonstrate appropriate ways for man to consider their place in the world and their relation to nature. In one instance Thoreau describes his entrance into town. He comments, â€Å"When I meet the engine with its train of cars moving off with planetary motion, -- or rather like a comet, for the beholder knows not if with that velocity